RFE 2026: USCIS Request for Evidence and how to respond
What a USCIS Request for Evidence (RFE) means, the 84-day limit, NOID vs RFE, how to build your response, and your options after a denial.
Contents3
Real RFEs, broken down by criterion:
- Request for Evidence (RFE): our database of USCIS RFEs, NOIDs and denials (in Russian; part of it is open to everyone, a free Telegram login opens the full database)
- Officer 0413 (EB-1A): one mistake and the whole case is dead - 27 patterns, 15 precedents (in Russian)
- Final merits: why petitions are denied after the criteria are accepted (in Russian)
Before we start
If you are reading this, you probably already know what an RFE (Request for Evidence) is, but you may not be sure how to answer it. It can also help to talk with people who are answering an RFE right now or have already been through one.
Getting an RFE can bring up a lot of hard feelings, from panic and depression to apathy and a sense of unfairness. Still, try to stay calm, keep a clear head and treat the situation with a cool, practical mind. Talking with people who have been through it, or are going through it now, can help.
A Telegram group for people who got an RFE
This is a community of people who are working on their answers or deciding whether to answer the RFE at all. To join, you give the group admins your full RFE as an "entry ticket". This keeps the group to people who really got an RFE and are ready to share their experience and advice.
Link to the group (Russian-speaking)
Or tap the card below:
Telegram group for people who got an RFE (in Russian): join here
What an RFE means, and common questions
What is an RFE?
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) can send a Request for Evidence (RFE) when an application or petition lacks the documents or information it needs to decide on the immigration benefit. If USCIS asks you for more evidence, it means the officer needs more information to keep reviewing your application or petition. Once USCIS issues an RFE, the review of your case stops, and this can cause a real delay. When you send USCIS the requested documents (before the deadline), the review continues.
If you do not answer the RFE by the deadline, your application or petition will almost certainly be denied. So a careful answer on time is important for the success of your case.
USCIS can issue Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs), and in some cases it can deny a benefit without sending an RFE or NOID first. Since August 5, 2026, USCIS policy lets officers do this when required initial evidence is missing or when the evidence does not show eligibility (USCIS Policy Alert PA-2026-05).
If you want to read about RFEs on the USCIS website, start here
An RFE comes on Form I-797E (Notice of Action), sent to the mailing address you gave in your petition. If your mailing address changed after you filed, you must update your address with USCIS so you do not miss important notices.
An RFE usually has four main parts:
- the law that applies,
- the evidence you already sent,
- the evidence that is still needed,
- the deadline for your answer.
If you do not answer by the deadline, your application may be denied.
The types of Form I-797 are explained on a USCIS page.
What an RFE is made of and how to read it
- The RFE starts with the law.
An RFE usually starts by quoting U.S. immigration law. The quote points to a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that sets the requirements for the type of application you filed. Honestly, unless you plan to challenge the request with a lawyer, this part of the RFE is not the key one. What matters is that you send all the requested evidence as soon as you can. - The evidence you already sent with the petition
This part lists the evidence you already sent in support of your application or petition. Check this list twice to make sure it includes everything you sent with your original filing. If USCIS left out something you sent, send it again as part of your RFE response. It often happens that USCIS misses something in your documents and asks you about facts you already gave in the petition. - Missing evidence
After listing what it already has from you, USCIS points to the evidence it still needs. Without that evidence, USCIS cannot decide your case under the immigration law requirements cited earlier in the notice. This part of the RFE is often quite long, because USCIS usually explains which requirements were not met and which other documents you can send if you do not have the requested originals. Study this part carefully and note everything you need to include in your answer to prove your case. - How much time do you have to answer?
At the end of the RFE, USCIS gives the deadline for your response and the mailing address to send it to. The deadline tells you how much time you have to put the response together and send it. Remember that your response must reach USCIS by the deadline: it is not enough to go to the post office on the due date and mail it. USCIS has to receive your answer by the date in the RFE. If that date falls on a Saturday, Sunday or federal holiday, a mailed response that arrives on the next business day is still on time. A response submitted online through your USCIS account counts on the day you submit it. In the deadline section, USCIS also explains what happens if you do not answer in time. Most often, USCIS decides your application without the missing information and, most likely, denies it.
If the petition was filed with premium processing, an RFE stops the clock. When USCIS receives your response, a new premium processing period starts: 15 business days for O-1 and most I-140s, 45 business days for EB-2 NIW and E13.
Does an RFE mean my case or petition was denied?
No.
An RFE does not mean USCIS denied your application, and it does not necessarily mean USCIS will deny it. It simply means that USCIS needs more information from you to decide your application. When you get an RFE, you must send your response by the deadline in the RFE notice. If you do not, USCIS will either treat your application as abandoned and deny it, or decide your case without the extra information it asked for. So if you have moved recently, make sure USCIS has your current address so you get the notice and can answer on time.
Is a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) a kind of RFE?
If you get an RFE (Request for Evidence) or a NOID (Notice of Intent to Deny) from USCIS, you need to send more evidence for your immigration case. But there are important differences between the two notices.
An RFE asks for more documents that can support your case. The RFE gives the date by which USCIS must receive your response. Go by that date. By law the response time is at most 12 weeks (84 days), and 3 days are added when USCIS mails the RFE, so the latest possible date is 87 days after USCIS mailed it. The deadline cannot be extended.
A NOID, on the other hand, is much more serious. It means USCIS believes you do not qualify for the benefit you asked for. The notice gives the reasons USCIS plans to deny your case, and you get a chance to send evidence in your defense. The NOID gives the date by which USCIS must receive your answer: at most 30 days, or at most 33 days after USCIS mailed it if it came by mail. This deadline cannot be extended either.
If you get a NOID, here are a few tips to stay organized and handle it:
- Read the NOID several times and make sure you fully understand what USCIS wants from you.
- Stay calm. A NOID is not a denial. You still have a chance to win your case.
- Review your original application. Something in it is missing or filled out wrong, or you would not have gotten a NOID.
- Prepare the documents that can support your case.
- Answer on time. Even if you do not have every document USCIS asked for, send what you have. If you miss the NOID deadline, your case can be denied.
Keep in mind that your case can still be denied after you answer a NOID. If that happens, depending on the form you may be able to appeal or file a motion, or you can file a new petition later. If you get a NOID, we strongly recommend talking to an experienced immigration lawyer.
An appeal or a motion to reopen or reconsider is filed on Form I-290B, usually within 30 calendar days of the decision (33 days if the decision came by mail). The I-290B filing fee is $800.
Step-by-step guide to answering an RFE
If you got an RFE from USCIS, look at the response deadline first. Your response must reach USCIS on or before that date. Mailing the package to the right address before the deadline is not enough. Plan ahead and act fast. Getting the evidence you need almost always takes longer than you think.
Step 1:
Make a copy of the RFE notice. The first thing to do when you get an RFE is to copy it for your records. You will need to send the original RFE notice (the paper notice you got from USCIS) with your response, so USCIS can match the response to your case.
Step 2:
Read the RFE and the list of specific requests carefully, then find the laws, regulations or other sources it cites as the basis. RFEs usually cite regulations, USCIS memos and guidance, plus cases and precedents from the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA), the federal courts of appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Step 3:
Gather the requested evidence. This is the most important step in answering an RFE. USCIS usually tells you exactly what evidence to send. It can be anything from missing passport pages or an incomplete bank statement to a birth certificate that is not in English. In that case, send the complete documents that were missing. A document in another language needs a full English translation, with the translator's certification that it is complete and accurate and that the translator is competent to translate into English.
In some RFEs, USCIS may say that some documents you sent from your country are not enough. USCIS may say this based on its understanding of the documents your country issues for events such as a marriage. If you get an RFE like this, check the State Department page U.S. Visa: Reciprocity and Civil Documents by Country. It shows which civil documents your country issues and how to get them.
General rule: the more evidence you send, the better. But at a minimum, you must give USCIS what the RFE asks for. If you cannot tell exactly what USCIS needs, read the filing instructions for the immigration form you filed, on the USCIS website.
USCIS generally does not send back the documents in your RFE response. So send copies, not original documents, unless USCIS specifically tells you otherwise.
Step 4:
Put together your RFE response package. Arrange your response in the same order in which USCIS listed the evidence. The original RFE notice goes on top as the first page of your response. Next comes a cover letter listing everything the officer will find in the package. List the enclosed evidence in the order you included it, so the officer reviewing your response can easily find each document.
Step 5:
Send your RFE response package to USCIS. The last step is to mail the package to the address given in the RFE notice. Send it to exactly that address, not to any other USCIS address you used before.
Send your RFE response as early as you can, so it does not reach USCIS after the deadline. If your response arrives late, USCIS can deny your case as abandoned or decide it without your response. For the same reason, choose a delivery service that lets you track when your envelope is delivered.
Ways to answer an RFE
You can answer an RFE in one of three ways: a full response, a partial response or no response.
Full response:
In a full response, you send all the evidence USCIS asked for (or more, if you think more evidence will help) before the deadline. Aim to send more evidence than USCIS asks for, so you avoid further problems with your application.
Partial response:
If you could not get all the evidence you need, send USCIS a partial response. Include as much of the requested evidence as you can. Then explain to USCIS why you cannot get the missing evidence. If possible, attach proof that the requested evidence is not available. A partial response tells USCIS that you want a decision based on the evidence you have now. If you fear the missing evidence will make USCIS deny your application, you can withdraw it, but the filing fees are not refunded and a withdrawal cannot be taken back.
No response:
You can choose not to answer the RFE. If you decide not to answer, or cannot answer by the deadline, USCIS will do one of the following:
- Treat your case as abandoned and deny it.
- Decide your case without the requested evidence, which often leads to a denial. Neither option is good, so if you do not plan to answer the RFE, it is often better to simply withdraw your application by contacting USCIS.
You can answer an RFE only once.
When you prepare your response, make sure it includes all the evidence you want to send. You cannot send evidence in parts, in separate envelopes. Everything must be put together and sent at once, in one package.
Why does USCIS send a Request for Evidence?
Here is what RFEs look like for different visa types.
- RFEs on O-1 petitions
Your employer or petitioner files Form I-129 to classify the beneficiary as a temporary worker with extraordinary ability. USCIS may then send a Request for Evidence asking you to show the beneficiary's extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim. The beneficiary's achievements must also be recognized in the field.
USCIS needs more information to process your petition, and that is what the RFE asks for. The RFE can explain why the evidence you sent is not enough and ask for more evidence before a final decision. It may also list suggested evidence you can send for each item it asks about.
If you believe a deficiency was identified by mistake, you can send an explanation with supporting evidence.
Note that it is up to you to send the evidence that best shows the petitioner and the beneficiary meet all the requirements and qualified for O-1 classification on the day Form I-129 was filed. You are also responsible for the statements in the letters attached to the petition, and they must be backed by evidence.
- RFEs on EB-2 NIW petitions
Requests for evidence can be very different. Still, some trends show up in many cases.
The EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) green card petition is still a popular choice for professionals and entrepreneurs with an advanced degree (a master's or higher, or a bachelor's plus five years of progressive experience) or exceptional ability, because it needs no U.S. employer as petitioner and no set amount of investment.
But EB-2 NIW is also one of the more subjective categories to file in, because the criteria that decide what counts as work in the "national interest" are written in general terms, and the USCIS officer's judgment plays a big role in every case.
For these reasons, even a beneficiary who carefully collects and sends every document for the NIW package can get an RFE.
Common reasons for an EB-2 NIW RFE:
Not enough explanation or proof of the beneficiary's specialty and proposed work in the U.S.
In one case published by a U.S. immigration law firm (it was eventually approved), a senior IT product developer at a well-known international consumer electronics company described 20 years of experience building an online TV content delivery platform and a cloud storage service. This work had brought significant revenue, wide adoption and national awards. Still, the USCIS officer issued an RFE, noting that the petition needed a more specific explanation of the applicant's proposed work in the U.S.
In response to the RFE, the developer wrote a detailed statement of his proposed plans. It gave an overview of existing technology in his industry and explained possible collaborations with specific U.S. companies, people and institutions in the field. In particular, he attached email exchanges with an official representative of one of these companies about a possible collaboration. He also made sure to explain clearly how his specific expertise could advance his industry in the U.S. as a whole. And he stressed that his wide network, high level of expertise and a decade of hands-on experience designing cloud content systems for TV would be hard to replace through normal hiring. In the end, his petition was approved.
Not enough proof that the applicant's proposed work has national importance.
Another common reason for an EB-2 NIW RFE is that the applicant did not convince the USCIS officer that the specific work they will do in the U.S. rises to the level of "national importance". USCIS officers do not accept simply stressing the national importance of an industry (for example, the semiconductor industry). The national importance argument has to be about the specific work the applicant will personally do in the U.S. Your petition and recommendation letters should show how your work will have a positive impact on the U.S. In particular, your letters should show why your field matters to U.S. interests and how it has national scope.
In another case published by a U.S. immigration law firm, which ended in an EB-2 NIW approval, an electric transportation systems specialist first proposed to continue his research and development of improved forklift systems (used in logistics and other fields). This did not convince the USCIS officer that the work rose to the level of national importance. In the RFE response, the specialist narrowed his focus to research and development of more efficient transformer designs that can also be used in electric vehicles. Such arguments should be backed by supporting material (for example, industry reports, press releases, government policy announcements) showing that the applicant's project will bring a significant positive effect for Americans' quality of life, technological progress and broad economic growth.
Too few concrete examples of the applicant's influence and impact on the field as a whole.
One of the main reasons for an RFE is a lack of concrete examples and proof of how the beneficiary's past work influenced the whole industry. Even if your research has many academic citations, you may get an RFE if you do not show that your work was actually used in commercial products, helped companies or government agencies work better, or led to real changes, such as higher revenue, lower costs or changed practices in the field.
EB-2 NIW
The best way to convince the USCIS officer is to make sure your proposed project in the U.S. is concrete and well thought out. Show concrete examples of your success in your field. Use letters from experts at independent organizations and your personal statement. And of course, show strong evidence that backs up these examples. This way you give enough solid proof of your past success and of how much your future project in the U.S. matters.
Too few recommendation letters that the officer found convincing as proof of your expertise and importance
Every EB-2 NIW petition should come with recommendation letters that confirm your qualifications. There is no minimum or maximum number of letters, and whether they are enough is up to the officer. Your letters should come from well-known people, managers, employers or colleagues who know your field. But USCIS gives more weight to letters from respected experts who did not work with you on the specific project behind your petition and your U.S. plans.
Not enough proof that you are able to keep advancing your proposed work.
This reason needs little explanation, but it is fairly common in EB-2 NIW RFEs. When you file, make sure you include evidence such as a copy of your degree, reports on your current professional work, bank statements, or an updated resume. If USCIS asks for these documents in the RFE, be sure to send them, or if the information is not available, send at least a partial response.
Not enough proof of your past success.
To convince USCIS to waive the job offer and the PERM labor certification for you, it is important to show that you have already succeeded in your field. If you have already run a similar large project, or can prove you have exceptional ability that meets the standard EB-2 requirements, it will help your case a lot. Here is what can show exceptional ability (you need at least three types of evidence from the list in 8 CFR 204.5(k)(3)(ii)). Besides an official academic record (a degree, diploma or certificate in your area of exceptional ability), the list includes:
- A salary or other pay that shows exceptional ability
- A license to practice your profession, or a certification for your occupation
- Letters from employers showing at least 10 years of full-time experience in your occupation
- Membership in professional associations
- Recognition for your achievements and significant contributions to the field from peers, government agencies, or professional or business organizations
PERM (Program Electronic Review Management) is the labor certification process an employer goes through to sponsor a foreign worker for a green card. It is required for most EB-2 and EB-3 petitions, except when the PERM requirement is waived, as in an EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) petition.
In PERM, the sponsoring employer has to show that it could not find qualified and willing U.S. workers for the job. This means posting job ads, interviewing candidates and documenting that no suitable candidates were found. The process can be long and demanding.
With EB-2 NIW, the applicant can skip PERM. The applicant has to show that their work will serve the "national interest" of the U.S., so the PERM requirements can be waived. This can make the process much simpler and faster.
When you get an EB-2 NIW RFE, you have limited time to answer. Remember that you get only one chance to answer all the questions in the RFE, so prepare all the evidence in advance.
There are three main ways to answer an EB-2 NIW RFE:
- Full response: you send all the evidence USCIS asked for in the RFE.
- Partial response: sometimes some evidence or arguments are not available, or your lawyer may decide a partial response is better. But in most cases, sending some evidence is better than sending none.
- Withdraw the petition: a last resort, when you cannot collect and send most of the evidence.
Sometimes USCIS just wants to see missing documents, such as a resume or a passport copy. But sometimes it asks for evidence to check again that you meet specific EB-2 NIW requirements. In those cases it is very important to work closely with your lawyer.
Besides an RFE, USCIS can also issue a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). This is more serious: it means USCIS believes you do not qualify for EB-2 NIW unless you send more evidence. If you get a NOID, talk to your lawyer or consult an immigration lawyer who can help you sort out the situation.
Frequently asked questions about RFEs
- What is the difference between a Request for Initial Evidence and a Request for Evidence?
A "Request for Initial Evidence" and a "Request for Evidence" (RFE) are both requests USCIS can send while reviewing an immigration petition. But there is a small difference between them.
A Request for Initial Evidence (RFIE) is usually sent when the petition as filed is missing required documents or information. It means USCIS needs that evidence or material before it can continue reviewing the petition. In other words, it asks for what should have been in the petition from the start. Since August 5, 2026, USCIS can also deny a filing that is missing required initial evidence without sending this request first.
Initial evidence is listed in the instructions for each form. USCIS also publishes an optional USCIS checklist of required initial evidence for Form I-129 on the USCIS website. But USCIS is not limited to these documents and can ask for anything relevant to the case.
A Request for Evidence (RFE) is sent when USCIS needs more evidence or information to review the petition more fully. Unlike an RFIE, it can come after USCIS has received and reviewed the initial documents, but before a final decision. USCIS may issue an RFE to clarify facts, verify information, check that immigration requirements are met, or resolve doubts.
The main difference is when they are sent. A Request for Initial Evidence comes when the original petition is missing required documents, while a Request for Evidence can come after the first review of the petition, to ask for more evidence or information.
Once USCIS issues an RFE or RFIE, the review of your case stops until you respond, and your priority date does not change. After a request for missing initial evidence, any USCIS processing time limit starts over when USCIS receives the evidence; after other RFEs it resumes where it stopped. There is no fixed time for when such a notice arrives, or for how long USCIS takes after your response: see the answer about RFE review times below. - How to read a Request for Evidence
After a Form I-129 petition is filed, petitioners often get a Request for Evidence from a USCIS service center. Sometimes they get an intent to deny (ITD), which is another name for a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). RFEs can differ a lot in content. Usually there are two types. The first is a "broad" RFE, which asks the petitioner for evidence that the beneficiary meets the criteria set by law.
In this case, USCIS believes the petitioner did not send enough evidence at filing to show that the beneficiary qualifies for O-1. The petitioner still has to answer every point of the RFE with new evidence and supporting material.
The other type of RFE asks the petitioner for specific additional material. In this case it can be hard to provide exactly the documents requested.
"Intent to Deny" (ITD), also called a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), is a letter USCIS sends to a petitioner when it plans to deny the petition. It is more serious than a Request for Evidence (RFE).
With an RFE, USCIS asks for more evidence or information to decide the petition. An RFE does not mean USCIS intends to deny the petition.
An ITD, on the other hand, is usually issued when USCIS believes the information in the petition is not enough or not credible, so the petition may be denied. The ITD gives the petitioner a chance to send more evidence or arguments before USCIS makes a final decision.
- What if I do not answer an RFE or RFIE?
Your answer to an RFE or RFIE matters a lot for your case, so send it on time, as early as you can. If you do not answer, USCIS may treat your application as abandoned, or decide your case without the information it asked for. Either way, that usually means a denial. If you are left without lawful status in the United States, USCIS can start removal (deportation) proceedings. - How does an RFE affect an adjustment of status case (Form I-485), and how can it affect the USCIS decision?
If you filed Form I-485 to adjust status and are waiting for a final decision, an RFE can affect the process. The review stops until USCIS receives your response, so the decision can be delayed. But an RFE does not mean your case starts over. The process is paused until you send the documents requested in the RFE.
Waiting for a final USCIS decision can be hard emotionally. A USCIS officer will decide whether your green card is approved or denied, and USCIS can delay the final decision for many reasons.
An RFE is a common reason for a delayed decision. So it is important to send your response by the deadline: the deadline is in the letter and is at most 12 weeks (84 days). After reviewing your response and documents, USCIS will make a final decision. - What should I do if I got an RFIE or RFE and cannot figure out how to answer it?
If you got a Request for Initial Evidence (RFIE) or a Request for Evidence (RFE), you must answer it, or your case may be stalled or even denied. Sometimes USCIS says exactly which documents to send, and sometimes its unclear wording can confuse you.
Do not assume the list of documents in a general RFE is the only way to answer. Lawyers who know the law can often suggest other ways to respond, perhaps with a cover letter explaining:
a) why the RFE is legally wrong, or b) why the response you sent is enough under the law.
Reviews from community members about working with lawyers are on a separate page (in Russian).
Real RFE cases:
"My online status changed to RFE, but no paper letter came. How do I get the text?" Step by step: register at myaccount.uscis.gov and add the case, but this reader got no access code for the I-140. The way out: call the USCIS Contact Center about the missing notice, or send an e-Request under "Did Not Receive Notice by Mail".
"I got a brutal RFE with premium processing from the California Service Center, officer EX0258: they asked about every one of my 5 criteria. How do I answer?" We looked at officer 0258 specifically (the patterns are similar to officer 0413). Advice: do not try to out-argue the officer; instead neutralize the officer's favorite phrases with documents. "Doubt cast on the record" calls for independent, objective evidence on every disputed point (the rule comes from Matter of Ho, 19 I&N Dec. 582 (BIA 1988): inconsistencies must be resolved "by independent objective evidence").
"A year ago I filed EB-1A with premium processing: RFE, then a denial. Then an O-1 with premium processing: approved without an RFE. In June I filed EB-1A again and it was approved without an RFE." A real story. The takeaway: after a first denial you can rework the case and file again with no penalty. The key is to rethink the weak criteria.
USCIS RFE database (in Russian; part of it is open to everyone, a free Telegram login opens the rest); Officer 0413: 27 patterns with quotes (in Russian); Final merits (in Russian).
What to do after an EB-1A denial: file again, appeal or go for an O-1?
There are three options:
- file EB-1A again, fixing the weak points the officer named in the denial;
- appeal, or ask USCIS to reopen or reconsider (Form I-290B: an appeal, or a motion to reopen or reconsider). The usual deadline is 30 calendar days from the decision, or 33 days if the decision came by mail (USCIS: I-290B);
- file in another category: O-1 or EB-2 NIW.
An I-140 denial is not, by itself, a reason to deny an O-1. Under the rules, even a pending green card petition is not a reason to deny an O-1 (8 CFR 214.2(o)(13)), and each petition is reviewed on its own. But the officer sees your past filings, so the facts in a new petition must match the earlier ones. If you were denied at the final merits step, here is how that step works: Final merits (in Russian).
How long does USCIS take to review an RFE response, and does it have a deadline?
There is a firm deadline only with premium processing. Your RFE response starts a new period of 15 business days (30 or 45 for some forms). If USCIS takes no action on the case in that time (an approval, a denial, a new RFE or NOID, or a fraud investigation), it refunds the premium processing fee (USCIS: premium processing).
With regular processing, use the official processing times for your form and service center as a guide (USCIS Processing Times). If your case takes longer than that, you can send an inquiry through e-Request.
Still have questions about this section? We have groups on Telegram (Russian-speaking) where we discuss O-1, EB-1 and EB-2 visas. You can ask questions or share your experience. Someone in the chat may be able to help by telling their own story and giving you confidence that your case can succeed.
Questions and answers from readers
A second RFE after answering the first one: has anyone had this?
Question: I answered an RFE, and some time later a new RFE came. The questions in it were about something completely different, things the first one never mentioned. Has anyone been in this situation? Is this normal practice or something unusual?
Team answer:
We have seen different variations, and this one several times too. Sometimes an RFE comes first and then a NOID: that is a classic. Two RFEs in a row also happen, but less often. Once USCIS lost part of an RFE response and had to send a new RFE saying it had lost part of the response and asking for it again.
EB-1 denied after an RFE response: appeal or file a new petition?
Question: I got the EB-1 denial electronically and honestly I am in shock. In my RFE response I attached all the bylaws, the membership requirements and proof that I meet the USCIS requirements for the associations criterion, and all of it was simply ignored. The officer decided the Council Members are not distinguished enough, even though I was admitted precisely for outstanding achievements, so the criterion requirements are in fact met. And it is the same for every criterion: it feels like the officer did not do a proper analysis. Has anyone appealed after something like this? Is it worth it, or is a new petition easier?
Reader's answer:
I got an EB-1 denial after an RFE in a similar situation. The officer flatly ignored all the evidence and did not accept a single criterion. Literally nothing counted. I had a call with my lawyer, and he is leaning toward going to court; he says it is a blatant procedural violation. And that point about council members who are "not distinguished": I recognize the logic exactly. You attach a document, the officer sees it, confirms seeing it, and still denies as if the document were not there. Before this I dug deep into court cases on appeals, and there are decisions for applicants exactly when the officer clearly ignored the evidence submitted, so the court route is not that hopeless.
Are EB visa RFEs more common now? Did the requirements change?
Question: I heard the rules for EB visas were updated and now many people get RFEs. Is that true or just rumors? If so, what exactly changed? Where can I read about it, are there any sources?
Reader's answer:
I recently got a notice that I have an RFIE on my EB-2, and I am waiting for the letter itself. I read that it can be technical: a missing signature, a bad translation. That is not like a regular RFE, which is about your qualifications and fitting the category. And the employment-based limits really did fall to about half of their peak, so maybe that is why they check more strictly.
My lawyer says not to include statements: will that cause an RFE later?
Question: My lawyer says statements like these are usually not included in the petition. I wanted to ask: did anyone have the same, and did it later cause an RFE? Or does it go fine without them?
Reader's answer:
In practice, RFEs often ask about things that are already in the petition. Answering with the same facts, just in more detail, works for them. My EB-1 RFE response was longer than the original case, and I got approved.
Reader's answer:
Thanks, that is encouraging. Did you write the RFE response yourself, or did a lawyer?
Reader's answer:
I wrote my RFE response myself, for a nonimmigrant case. I decided not to take chances and sent it to a lawyer to check. They redid everything, and it came back many times longer. At least now I can wait for the result more calmly.
Reader's answer:
My O-1 RFE was also about the I-129 itself: they asked me to describe the duties and the salary, nothing about evidence or criteria. At first I did not know how to read it, but my lawyer explained it is more of a good sign: the officer did not dig into the petition itself, just double-checked the form.
Reader's answer:
Referring to what the officer said in the RFE is completely normal, since you are answering the officer's specific questions. My lawyer built it exactly that way: first the officer's point (the criterion rests on recommendation letters, but extraordinary ability is not proven), then a breakdown of letters #1, #2, #3 with specific quotes about how rare these qualities are. You literally point the officer to what each document proves. When criteria get mixed up, this kind of breakdown is what saves you.
Reader's answer:
For my EB-1A I have a separate summary for each criterion, with a direct quote from the document.
How do I read the USCIS decision after an RFE: how many criteria were accepted before and after?
Question: How can you even tell how many criteria USCIS accepted at filing and how many after the RFE response, for example 1 at filing and 1 after? Do they say it clearly in the decision letter, or do you have to work it out yourself? I am trying to understand how to answer a USCIS RFE step by step and then read the result.
Reader's answer:
As far as I can tell, the RFE letter itself says which criteria were accepted and which need more evidence. But one thing surprised me: the final denial can accept more criteria than the RFE did and still fall short of three. I am preparing six criteria with exactly this in mind, so there is enough even in that scenario.
My RFE asks me to redo 4 criteria: is that normal?
Question: I got an RFE asking me to redo about 4 criteria. Is it normal to ask for that many at once? Does that mean I have to rebuild the whole case?
Reader's answer:
4 criteria in an RFE is unpleasant, but not fatal. The solution is fairly clear: rewrite the whole case, add evidence for each disputed criterion, and try to get 10 new recommendation letters signed or rewrite the old ones, not send the same ones. There are stories (in Russian) where exactly this kind of RFE ended in an approval.
Reader's answer:
Do the recommendations have to be new, or can I just ask the same people for different letters? Collecting ten from scratch sounds impossible.
Reader's answer:
That is normal. On this site you can find stories where the RFE accepted none of the claimed criteria. I think you should definitely defend your strong criteria, and add as many new documents as you can, especially if the RFE is to the point and the officer asked for something specific.
Reader's answer:
New letters are easier, of course, but I was told the same recommenders can rewrite theirs, and you do not have to find ten new people from scratch. So for now I am collecting a second round.
Reader's answer:
I meant documents (objective evidence), if the officer asked for them, not letters.
On recommendation letters I cannot tell you what to do; it depends on the RFE text. If the officer asks, for example, to confirm the scholarly value of your articles, a letter from a respected scientist in your field would really help (ideally someone who does not know you and/or has cited the papers you claim). If such a person already wrote a letter supporting your contribution, you could ask them to sign a new letter supporting the scholarly articles criterion.
Reader's answer:
I am collecting a second round, and many agreed to rewrite their letters, so it is not as scary as it seemed at first.
Reader's answer:
Our lawyer explained that some RFEs are mostly template text, and looking for a specific officer's logic in them is pointless. The advice was to point again to everything already attached and to rethink the logic of the petition itself. Sometimes the problem is not too little evidence but how it is structured.
Reader's answer:
If the officer took apart every criterion one by one in the RFE, that is a bad sign. In my view such an RFE is sometimes just a formal step before a denial. In that case it can be wiser to withdraw and refile with a corrected case, with a chance of getting a different officer. If the officer asks specific questions and doubts individual points, that is different, and answering makes sense.
Reader's answer:
I had a huge RFE: the officer asked about specific dates and specific people, and even got my recommenders' last names wrong in the text of the request. My lawyer had held back a couple of strong cards on purpose, for a possible RFE. In the end the response package was bigger than the whole original case.
Reader's answer:
My RFE was on the contribution criterion: the officer asked for concrete proof of impact on the field, not just letters about expertise but actual citations with numbers. When I refiled, I focused on exactly that: how many times each paper is cited, in which journals, and by whom. The second time, no RFE.
Denied after an RFE: is it a NOID or a NOIR, and should I challenge it or refile?
Question: My status recently changed to "Case Was Denied" after I answered the RFE. I thought I had answered the USCIS RFE correctly, step by step, and collected all the documents, but now I do not understand: is this a NOID or a NOIR? Officer XM1747 has my case. What do you advise: try to challenge the decision or file again?
Reader's answer:
A NOID is a notice of intent to deny, and even after it you still get a chance to answer. If your status shows "Case Was Denied", that is a final decision, not an intent. An RFE by itself is not a denial; it is a lawful request for more evidence. With my O-1, the RFE came within days of filing, and it said plainly that nothing was wrong, I just needed to add evidence for the criteria. A NOIR is a different story: it is about already approved petitions that USCIS wants to revoke. Read the denial notice carefully: it lists the specific grounds, and without them you cannot tell what makes sense, a motion to reopen or a new petition.
Is everyone getting an RFE now, or does it just seem that way?
Question: It feels like almost everyone is getting an RFE now. Several people I talk to got RFEs in the last couple of months. Is this really a wave, or is it just my circle?
Reader's answer:
Most of the people I know who filed in recent months did not get an RFE.
This page is part of O1EB1, a free education program of Global Talent Foundation Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. Our mission is to help talented professionals understand the O-1, EB-1A and EB-2 NIW visas using official sources. We sell nothing and do not give legal advice. About O1EB1
Disclaimer
This is an independent analysis of public sources: laws, regulations and USCIS decisions.
It is not legal advice. The authors are not licensed US attorneys. Using this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Immigration policy changes. Check the current rules on uscis.gov and discuss your case with a licensed immigration attorney.